The slouching Supreme Court sits up straight
I am greatly heartened to learn that President Bush quite obviously reads Reasonable Nuts. After all, if you pull up the entry from last Thursday ("The (long) list"), you'll see his Supreme Court justice nominee, Samuel Alito, mentioned first on that list. Knowing the President has a short attention span, it is reasonable to assume this is precisely how he arrived at the choice of Alito.
Actually, I need to render a mea culpa for my commentary last Thurday. I was flat-out wrong in my assumption that Bush would nominate another woman - going so far as to state that no one could even imagine him not doing so. Well, at least I have my day job.
In any event, it is good to see a strong choice now made for this very important position. I hope he is prepared for the scrutiny and wish him and his family the best. I read the comment of one Senate Democrat who called the choice "needlessly provocative". I would agree that the choice was indeed provocative, though I would disagree with the needless comment. Rather, it was needfully so.
Actually, I need to render a mea culpa for my commentary last Thurday. I was flat-out wrong in my assumption that Bush would nominate another woman - going so far as to state that no one could even imagine him not doing so. Well, at least I have my day job.
In any event, it is good to see a strong choice now made for this very important position. I hope he is prepared for the scrutiny and wish him and his family the best. I read the comment of one Senate Democrat who called the choice "needlessly provocative". I would agree that the choice was indeed provocative, though I would disagree with the needless comment. Rather, it was needfully so.








3 Comments:
Thanks for writing my post for me. :)
We seem to be on the same track on this one. I need to read up more about him, but Alito (or "Scalito" as they are already calling him) seems a much wiser choice than Miers (no offense to her personally).
To echo what you said, there NEEDED to be a fight for the nominee, not backing down on who NEEDS to be on the Supreme Court at this time. Not just to placate the conservatives, or fulfill the promises he made to shift the court more conservative/constitutionalist should he have the chance to nominate for the Supreme Court, but simply to do what is right and just.
Democrats will howl and whine regardless of who it is--just because the person is nominated by a Republican president is grounds enough for them. The only reason they didn't say much on Miers was because the Republicans were doing it for them.
As I have said before, time will tell and we shall see...
Queen Spoo, you are beginning to sound like John McCain!
How dare you insult my wife with such a vile and reprehensible slur!!!
Post a Comment
<< Home