liberal = anti-rational hack
Here's another reason (as if one were needed) to despise the anti-intellectualism of today's liberals:
I have long argued that conservative notions tend to win the day primarily because they are disseminated through the free marketplace of ideas. They only lose when that marketplace is obscured with deceit, lies, or the moral failings of the conservative messenger.
Anyone who wins through deceit is still a loser.
Fifty or so other Republican candidates have also been made targets in a sophisticated “Google bombing” campaign intended to game the search engine’s ranking algorithms. By flooding the Web with references to the candidates and repeatedly cross-linking to specific articles and sites on the Web, it is possible to take advantage of Google’s formula and force those articles to the top of the list of search results.Liberals by and large cannot win a fair contest of any stripe, be it an argument or an election. So they resort to such tactics to spike the results. They are the cheaters who graduate with hollow degrees; Ted Kennedy is their poster child.
I have long argued that conservative notions tend to win the day primarily because they are disseminated through the free marketplace of ideas. They only lose when that marketplace is obscured with deceit, lies, or the moral failings of the conservative messenger.
Anyone who wins through deceit is still a loser.








2 Comments:
Yes, and Republicans ALWAYS fight fair.
Getting articles about candidates in front of people who have searched google for articles about said candidates is WAY worse than saying Michael J. Fox is faking it.
The deceit, lies and moral failings that you speak of are not, as recient events have shown, exclusive to a single party.
The republicans control all three branches of the government. This means no checks or balances. The messes they have made for themselves and for the country are living proof that absolute power corrupts absolutely.
To think that the right are not engaging in as bad or worse tactics is naive. Had the right thought of it first, you'd say it was a great idea.
This kind of straw man arguement is exactly what has lead to the polarization of the country to seemingly unrepairable extremes. The more people bicker, the less actually gets done, and you are fueling that.
thanks for the comment, anonymous.
a "straw man" is a weak or imaginary opposition, set up often for the purpose of easily knocking it down. i don't think this qualifies.
you offer the suggestion that conservatives do this kind of thing as well. i disagree strongly. perhaps Republicans do these things from time to time, but very seldom do CONSERVATIVES.
part of what makes a conservative is an adherence to certain principles. i argue here that winning fairly is one of them.
Post a Comment
<< Home